dev #10
|  | @ -14,7 +14,6 @@ def get_conf_stage( | |||
|     conf_stage = result.StageDetail( | ||||
|         name=task_stage.name, | ||||
|         # group is determined by adding between "[]" in the name of the task | ||||
| 
					
					jon-lee marked this conversation as resolved
					
						
						
							Outdated
						
					
				 | ||||
|         # FIXME: this is probably outdated | ||||
|         group=( | ||||
|             match.group(1) | ||||
|             if (match := re.search(r"\[([^\[\]]+)\]", task_stage.name or "")) | ||||
|  | @ -110,9 +109,7 @@ def fix_keyword( | |||
| def fix_result_detail( | ||||
|     task_stage: task.Stage, conf_stage: result.StageDetail, parser: str | ||||
| ) -> None: | ||||
|     result_detail_parser = next( | ||||
|         p for p in conf_stage.parsers if p.name == "result-detail" | ||||
|     ) | ||||
|     result_detail_parser = next(p for p in conf_stage.parsers if p.name == parser) | ||||
|     show_files = [] | ||||
|     if task_stage.result_detail.stdout: | ||||
|         show_files.append("stdout") | ||||
|  |  | |||
		Loading…
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user
	
BTW, is this outdated?
Never heard about this rule.
@manuel what would be the current intended rule for
group?seems current strategy is fine, resolved.